|Posted by big mike M on June 11, 2012 at 5:40 PM||comments (0)|
I already proved to you that west Africans, AE, south Africans and great lake region people all share a common ancestor! Which is my the 18 dynasty mummies had genetics of the 3 groups I listed. My info proves I'm right! Stop twisting things.
MODERN DAY West Africans did not live in west Africa at that time. There were people there, namely batwa. However, the people who predominate the area now, were NOT there at that time, this is a undisputed fact. Even the recent academic gathering in Chapel Hill discuss this very fact, that early bones/skulls do not match present day people. Obviously, if Herodotus said the Libyans came across kingdoms of people (batwa), who helped them get back to their homeland, then the area was inhabited, the question is, by WHOM.
Herodotus relates a story from some Libyans, who say, when they went into the region where the Niger River picks up, in what I assume may have been Mali, there was a kingdom of Batwa people living there. Also, most if not All west African groups have stories of coming from the north from their present locations. Well that or from the east, but again, not local to where they are now.
Now explain to me why scientist say King Tut died of sickle cells which is mainly found in west Africans?
Also explain to me why scientist say the AE had a closet body plan to AA's then any other???? Note that this not by DNAtribes.
No doubt that Bantu and Ancient Egyptian share the same ancestors. Bantu and Ancient Egyptians are alike. Same as being alike with other African subgroups which also include Tropical West Africans and Sahara Africans (those 2 subgroups to a lower degree). But that was before the diversification of their language into Bantu. Egyptians didn't spoke a Bantu language but a language parent to Bantu languages. Like Germanic to English. Like this:
It is evident that great lake region people(bantu), west Africans, south Africans and Egyptians all shara a common ancestor! You can deny this all you want, but its futile no matter what you do. And why the f**k would I wanna be a Hebrew? I [email protected] religion!
|Posted by big mike M on June 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM||comments (0)|
Why the hell should I not call you a Eurocentric. When you call everyone who doesn't agree with you aftonazis!!! And you E-thug everyone...
And when the f**k did I say WA and were exactly the same as east and north Africans. I said are f**king related. Like a distant cousin, but they aren't exactly the same! And I graduated from college thank very much. And how many f**king times do I have to tell you that Africans have different phenotypes because of different climates/environments! DNAtribes said the mummies and king tut can trace their ancestry from south Africa, great lake region and the west Africa!
Recent studies are saying that King Tut died of sickle cells. Which is mainly found in west Africans!
Explains that one... Please!
Africans are indeed very diverse genetically because they are the source population for all mankind. The older a population is, the more accumulation of genetic variation and thus diversity. However, greater diversity does NOT mean less relativity. For example, even among the gene pool of a single isolated population where much inbreeding has occurred there is still some form of variation or diversity. It may not be as much as say a larger population that has much contact and geneflow with other populations. Still even among the gene pool of a single family there is genetic variation also even if all members are related to one another. The same can be said of Africans. Genetically there are many clades and subclades and even variation within subclades that are to be found among Africans, yet just because you have individuals who carry lineages of a certain clade does not mean they are not related or even share other genetic characteristics with individuals who carry lineages of another clade, especially if all these individuals reside within the same community or region. Because Africans have such tremendous genetic diversity, there is actually more genetic variation within a single village in Africa than there is in say a state in the U.S. or a nation in Europe, but that doesn't mean all these villagers have no relation to one another! An even better example would be chimpanzees, our closest related species. The chimp species is even older than humans which is why their genetic diversity is even greater still. Two individual chimpanzees of the same population in the same forest have more genetic variations between them than two individual humans who live in opposite ends of the globe, but that does not mean they are unrelated!
As for Egypt. Geology shows that the Sahara desert did not always exist and North Africa was once green and fertile. Archaeology also shows that the area that is now Egypt has also received migrations of populations from farther west in the central Sahara as North Africa began to dry out and turn to desert. This is supported by genetics such as the fact that Egyptians carry the Benin variety of HBS (sickle cell anemia).
Note that while ancient Egyptians share many cultural features with other east Africans, there are other cultural peculiarities such as ritual masks, dolls, the wearing of wigs, and iconographic styles that are to be found in West Africa. What's funny is that Eurocentric racialist try to associate any so-called 'Eurasian' lineage in Africa with stereotyped "caucasian" features yet all the carriers of R1 derived haplogroups in West Africa are stereotypically "negroid" in characteristics yet nobody tries to 'relate' these "forest n*gros" with indigenous white Europeans who carry share the same clade! LOL In the meantime there are Europeans especially southern Europeans in the Mediterranean who carry E lineages clearly inherited from Africans in the neolithic, yet you hardly hear a peep about African migrations into Europe and African admixture among Europeans when that is clearly the case!